I hope you won't mind if I blow my firms trumpet a bit?
Moderators: Aladinsaneuk, MartDude, D-Rider, Moderators
I hope you won't mind if I blow my firms trumpet a bit?
Some of you may recall that a couple of weeks ago I asked if anyone had an Aprilia scooter that I could borrow for a reconstruction I was doing, and many of you will have read in the past my views on using claims management companies or legal expenses appointed solicitors in the event that you are unfortunate enough to have a crash.
On this basis, I thought you might be interested in the case for which I was looking for the scooter, which in any case we settled last week. The case as you will read is over 10 years old because just such a firm sat on the case for 6 years and did nothing bar the basics and issue proceedings to protect the claimants rights. We took over the case and had to fight the young riders corner, now thankfully with the right result.
What has made this case interesting is that it has set a bit of case law. The third party made an offer. The case went to trial to determine values. The third party then tried to make it a requirement that the claimant be subjected to a medical examination every 5 years to establish whether the payments could be reduced.
However, this was not included in what is called the Part 36, and despite legal arguments, the Judge ruled that conditions to a part 36 could not be amended once it went trial
Anyway, as I hope you can appreciate, we are pretty pleased with this result after the claimant and his mother lost hope with the previous firm who were representing them, and I thought I would share it with you.
Injured motorcyclist awarded £3.6 million
A 26-year-old man from south London, who had been an aspiring Premier League footballer, was last week awarded £3.6 million in compensation by the High Court, following a motorcycle accident that occurred ten years ago.
The man, who does not wish to be named and is otherwise referred to as Mr X, was involved in a head-on collision in 2002 while riding his scooter in Thornton Heath. The then 16-year-old was hit by a van being driven by Christopher Evans who had failed to notice the oncoming motorcyclist while attempting to make a right turn.
Mr X sustained multiple injuries in the collision, including a fractured right femur, fractures to both wrists, his right elbow and right ankle. He later developed chronic pain and psychological disorders, including severe Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, a Major Depressive Disorder and severe Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. He also sustained a brain injury with resulting cognitive, behavioural and emotional difficulties, personality changes, heightened fatigue and persisting headaches.
The combination of Mr X’s physical and mental conditions made it impossible for him to return to Coulsdon College, where he had previously been studying for a qualification in Business Studies. The talented footballer also had to give up any hope of playing for the Premier League football team he had had trials with. He has since been unable to contemplate employment, and is dependent on his mother for round-the-clock care.
The High Court ordered that Mr X’s award of £3.6 million was to be paid partly as a lump sum of £2.05 million, and partly by annual payments for the remainder of his life. It will be managed by his professional Deputy, Nicola Manning of McMillan Williams Solicitors who has been appointed by the Court of Protection.
Mr X’s solicitor, Phillip Scarles of McMillan Williams, who specialise in dealing with motorcycle accidents and took over the case from another law firm, said: “Not only did Mr X sustain severe orthopaedic injuries and develop chronic pain, he also developed severe psychological disorders. His mother’s care for him in very difficult living circumstances has been outstanding. This award will enable Mr X to move with his family to a home that will be much more suitable and will enhance his quality of life as much as possible.”
On this basis, I thought you might be interested in the case for which I was looking for the scooter, which in any case we settled last week. The case as you will read is over 10 years old because just such a firm sat on the case for 6 years and did nothing bar the basics and issue proceedings to protect the claimants rights. We took over the case and had to fight the young riders corner, now thankfully with the right result.
What has made this case interesting is that it has set a bit of case law. The third party made an offer. The case went to trial to determine values. The third party then tried to make it a requirement that the claimant be subjected to a medical examination every 5 years to establish whether the payments could be reduced.
However, this was not included in what is called the Part 36, and despite legal arguments, the Judge ruled that conditions to a part 36 could not be amended once it went trial
Anyway, as I hope you can appreciate, we are pretty pleased with this result after the claimant and his mother lost hope with the previous firm who were representing them, and I thought I would share it with you.
Injured motorcyclist awarded £3.6 million
A 26-year-old man from south London, who had been an aspiring Premier League footballer, was last week awarded £3.6 million in compensation by the High Court, following a motorcycle accident that occurred ten years ago.
The man, who does not wish to be named and is otherwise referred to as Mr X, was involved in a head-on collision in 2002 while riding his scooter in Thornton Heath. The then 16-year-old was hit by a van being driven by Christopher Evans who had failed to notice the oncoming motorcyclist while attempting to make a right turn.
Mr X sustained multiple injuries in the collision, including a fractured right femur, fractures to both wrists, his right elbow and right ankle. He later developed chronic pain and psychological disorders, including severe Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, a Major Depressive Disorder and severe Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. He also sustained a brain injury with resulting cognitive, behavioural and emotional difficulties, personality changes, heightened fatigue and persisting headaches.
The combination of Mr X’s physical and mental conditions made it impossible for him to return to Coulsdon College, where he had previously been studying for a qualification in Business Studies. The talented footballer also had to give up any hope of playing for the Premier League football team he had had trials with. He has since been unable to contemplate employment, and is dependent on his mother for round-the-clock care.
The High Court ordered that Mr X’s award of £3.6 million was to be paid partly as a lump sum of £2.05 million, and partly by annual payments for the remainder of his life. It will be managed by his professional Deputy, Nicola Manning of McMillan Williams Solicitors who has been appointed by the Court of Protection.
Mr X’s solicitor, Phillip Scarles of McMillan Williams, who specialise in dealing with motorcycle accidents and took over the case from another law firm, said: “Not only did Mr X sustain severe orthopaedic injuries and develop chronic pain, he also developed severe psychological disorders. His mother’s care for him in very difficult living circumstances has been outstanding. This award will enable Mr X to move with his family to a home that will be much more suitable and will enhance his quality of life as much as possible.”
- flatlander
- Eprom Test Pilot (Stig)
- Posts: 3097
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:06 pm
- Location: cheshire
Wel done skipper can only really fault you on one thing in the whole of your submission
If it was stamped with the same seal as your avatar it's likely the judge just took pity on you
Seriously though well done was the below but the point \ rule of law
However, this was not included in what is called the Part 36, and despite legal arguments, the Judge ruled that conditions to a part 36 could not be amended once it went trial
The wife is studying law so it will look like I am more interested than I am if I bring that one up which equates to pass out points
If it was stamped with the same seal as your avatar it's likely the judge just took pity on you

Seriously though well done was the below but the point \ rule of law
However, this was not included in what is called the Part 36, and despite legal arguments, the Judge ruled that conditions to a part 36 could not be amended once it went trial
The wife is studying law so it will look like I am more interested than I am if I bring that one up which equates to pass out points

For the avoidance of doubt and for the benefit of my wife, not everything I may say here will be absolutely true I may on ocassion embellish a little for effect.
That said when it comes to motorbikes, I like to ride side saddle with a nice frock
That said when it comes to motorbikes, I like to ride side saddle with a nice frock
- Willopotomas
- GP Racer
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:11 pm
- Location: Coventry, ENGLAND
..... and they got a result in my case ..... though I would like to point out that I didn't win £3M from it - before you crowd of spongers come running up with your requests for RSV4s, MV Agustas and the like .....
“Scientists investigate that which already is. Engineers create that which has never been.”
-- Albert Einstein
-- Albert Einstein
- Samray
- Double World Champion
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:36 pm
- Location: Riding round with Sheene and Simoncelli
"I hope you won't mind if I blow my firms trumpet a bit
As you see, there are some here that gladly blow that trumpet too.
Nice result.

Nice result.
In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular.
- Aladinsaneuk
- Aprilia Admin
- Posts: 9503
- Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:37 pm
- Location: Webfoot territory