BMF calls for justice

Message

BikerGran · #1 Post by **BikerGran** » Mon May 14, 2012 9:36 pm

Apparently it's alright for an HGV driver to be over the centre line of the road, but not for a motorcyclist to ride anywhere near it even if he's on his own side.

http://www.bmf.co.uk/pages/news.php?fullstory=1070

http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Home/A- ... 052012.htm

D-Rider · #2 Post by **D-Rider** » Mon May 14, 2012 10:12 pm

Crazy and outrageous decision. This takes "the law is an ass" to a new level.

That said, what on earth possessed the rider to admit that he was partly liable as he agreed he wasn't appropriately positioned - despite being in a place he was completely entitled to be and who knows how ideal the position was or wasn't as we are not given enough info.
That ridiculous admission has led to a judgement that could be used as a precedent against any of us.

I hope the BMF pursue and win this one for all of us

#3 Post by **Kwackerz** » Mon May 14, 2012 10:15 pm

What the fek was Whiteford on about?! He proper shot himself and others when they use his as an example, in the foot.

'Your dance space, my dance space.' simple as. Road position is irrelevant. You're allowed to travel at any position in your lane.

Aladinsaneuk · #4 Post by **Aladinsaneuk** » Mon May 14, 2012 10:25 pm

I suspect the actual question and answer was not as reported

Case stinks though

D-Rider · #5 Post by **D-Rider** » Mon May 14, 2012 11:06 pm

Aladinsaneuk wrote:I suspect the actual question and answer was not as reported

Case stinks though

Even so, what on earth was his lawyer doing by not advising him in the implications of answering in a way that could be construed to mean it like that?!

BikerGran · #6 Post by **BikerGran** » Tue May 15, 2012 5:03 pm

The lawyer was probably a non-biker too - always pays to go to bike specialists that understand the situation.

fatboy · #7 Post by **fatboy** » Tue May 15, 2012 5:18 pm

Shocking,disgusting, almost beyond belief
What is blatantly clear is that many people involved are of no use whatso ever to the justice system.
If the lorry was too wide for that particular section of road then an 'outrider' should have been used to warn adancing traffic, as you would see in front of a combined harvester
Surely this ruling is as water tight as a sieve
Too high a standard imposed on the lorry driver? FFS you should be able to drive to the highest standard to drive the fucking thing safely

Willopotomas · #8 Post by **Willopotomas** » Tue May 15, 2012 5:53 pm

I expect all drivers of any vehicle and all riders to drive to an exceptional standard. Unfortunately, they don't, which is why I have eye's looking out the hole in my arse when driving. The standard of driving and riding in this country is appalling, but this takes the piss.. I really don't know how some people sleep at night.

Gio · #9 Post by **Gio** » Wed May 16, 2012 2:15 pm

Willopotomas wrote:The standard of driving and riding in this country is appalling

You sir are being generous. 90% of the drivers in this country shouldn'd be allowed a bicycle, let alone be in charge of a motorised vehicle.

Also the gentleman in question looks a few marbles short.

The BMF should let this go, after all he admitted culpability. Its cut and dried

D-Rider · #10 Post by **D-Rider** » Wed May 16, 2012 2:25 pm

Gio wrote: You sir are being generous. 90% of the drivers in this country shouldn'd be allowed a bicycle

.... and as at least 90% of them don't ride a bicycle, self regulation seems to be winning on that part of the debate