More nonsense from parliament

Message

Paulh · #1 Post by **Paulh** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:51 am

My MP even supported this.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/mai ... bike17.xml

I've written to the little sod expressing my opinions, but I'm not holding my breath for his reply.

The actual debate can be read on Hansard - its all nonsense about illegal use of mini-motos, but as usual will only hit the innocent law abiding majority.

Samray · #2 Post by **Samray** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:14 am

It is still March, right?

Rickyrock · #3 Post by **Rickyrock** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:37 pm

snapdragon · #4 Post by **snapdragon** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:13 pm

Total Lunacy - MotoX, Greenlaners plus all other racing and museums

plus the fact that there wil Never be a policeman on the streets where kids are buzzing round on mini bikes so they would never be caught whether they had a plate or not.

lazarus · #5 Post by **lazarus** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:22 am

What e mail address did you find for this dork? On the parliamentary lists he says "no e mail". Mustnt like the electorate.

Falcopops · #6 Post by **Falcopops** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:13 am

and these idiots are supposed to be there to make sure us simpletons are looked after.

It makes you wonder hoe much research and legal advice these TW*TS get or listen to.

Gio · #7 Post by **Gio** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:36 am

Falcopops wrote: and these idiots are supposed to be there to make sure us simpletons are looked after.

It makes you wonder hoe much research and legal advice these TW*TS get or listen to.

Hey with once brain cell shared around what do you expect

lazarus · #8 Post by **lazarus** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:10 am

Reply from my M.P.

" Dear Mr. ********,

Thanks for this.

I am completely in agreement with you that what we need is more stringent enforcement of existing legislation rather than further dead weight in the statute book. While I do recognise that there are many dangers and annoyances posed by mini-motorbikes I believe that local authorities and central Government should be working harder together to ensure the more-than-sufficient laws that are already in place are followed.

For this reason, I do not believe I will be supporting the Bill.

Thank you again for contacting me.

Yours sincerely,

David Davies, MP"

He has proved to be a helpful MP so I'm in the difficult position of wanting to vote for him but not for his party!

Samray · #9 Post by **Samray** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:27 am

I'm in the difficult position of wanting to vote for him but not for his party!

A frequent conundrum.

Gio · #10 Post by **Gio** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:23 am

lazarus wrote:He has proved to be a helpful MP so I'm in the difficult position of wanting to vote for him but not for his party!

The parties are all the same now, well they look the same with the same ideas.

So you vote for what is right for you and not his party.

lazarus · #11 Post by **lazarus** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:46 am

You might vote for him, but its the party you put in power.

Gio · #12 Post by **Gio** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:54 pm

lazarus wrote:You might vote for him, but its the party you put in power.

And that party has the same ideas as the others, so whats the difference.

D-Rider · #13 Post by **D-Rider** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 10:01 pm

Gio wrote:
lazarus wrote:You might vote for him, but its the party you put in power.
And that party has the same ideas as the others, so whats the difference.

Their words are similar these days .... but I've not forgotten the dark days of the 80's and wouldn't take the risk of putting that lot in power again!

fastasfcuk · #14 Post by **fastasfcuk** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:36 am

what about the dark days of the 70's

Gio · #15 Post by **Gio** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:44 pm

fastasfcuk wrote:what about the dark days of the 70's

Ahh 3day weeks and then from 75 to 80 33% inflation, oh the joy (cynical

)