Premium Fuel........or not?

The place to discuss any issues with your Aprilia, share tips and handy reference links

Moderators: Aladinsaneuk, MartDude, D-Rider, Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Fausto
SuperBike Racer
SuperBike Racer
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:04 pm
Location: Sunny Suffolk

Premium Fuel........or not?

#1 Post by Fausto » Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:50 pm

Filled up with Shell's premium grade unleaded yesterday just to see what difference it makes. Had a good ride and the bike went well - but then it generally does.

So - what grade do people use and who notices any difference ?

User avatar
Falco9
Aprilia Admin
Posts: 1154
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 9:24 pm
Location: Wakefield. West Yorkshire

#2 Post by Falco9 » Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:54 pm

I've always used good old std unleaded. I did try the premium unleaded when I put the SL chip in the bike and immediately noticed "absolutely nothing" :smt013

If there is an improvement I couldn't feel or sense it.

IMHO save your money for suspension mods that's an area you can feel an improvement :smt016

F9

gazuk
Track Day Addict
Track Day Addict
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:56 pm
Location: West Sussex
Main bike: vfr 750ft

#3 Post by gazuk » Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:17 pm

I believe Ride magazine did an article on this, and their conclusion was it did make a difference.

Note very helpful I know, but might jog someone's memory who doesn't just read the magazine in Tesco's.

User avatar
D-Rider
Admin
Admin
Posts: 15560
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:09 pm
Location: Coventry

#4 Post by D-Rider » Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:26 pm

gazuk wrote:I believe Ride magazine did an article on this, and their conclusion was it did make a difference.

Note very helpful I know, but might jog someone's memory who doesn't just read the magazine in Tesco's.
It might, in theory, make a difference.
It might make a difference that can be measured on a dyno.
It might make a difference you can demonstrate in a test on a drag strip.

BUT

How much of the time are our throttles fully to the stop and we can't get the same effect by just cracking it open a bit further?

OK in the past I did have a reputation as someone who needed a switch rather than a throttle but the grunt of the Falco has greatly reduced the amount of time that the throttle's hard against the stop (or maybe I'm just becoming an old wus).

gazuk
Track Day Addict
Track Day Addict
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:56 pm
Location: West Sussex
Main bike: vfr 750ft

#5 Post by gazuk » Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:53 pm

Ride also did an article on how much of the throttle was actually used in normal riding. I think it was between 30% - 40%. So now they tend to highlight changes/mods that affect this area.

Used to buy Ride religiously every month, now just read it in Tesco's.

Again, not a very helpful post :smt017

User avatar
Gio
Double World Champion
Posts: 6179
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: Chertsey

#6 Post by Gio » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:29 pm

I don't think you'd notice any improvement on a litre bike.

User avatar
Fausto
SuperBike Racer
SuperBike Racer
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:04 pm
Location: Sunny Suffolk

#7 Post by Fausto » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:40 pm

Gio wrote:I don't think you'd notice any improvement on a litre bike.
meaning that you would on a small bike OR on a larger bike ? :smt017

User avatar
Nooj
GP Racer
GP Racer
Posts: 2718
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: Newbury, Berkshire

Is there any point in using it?

#8 Post by Nooj » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:17 pm

Isn't it supposed to be for use in highly tuned, high compession engines? I thought that in most cars and bikes it made no difference at all.
SHINY BIKE SYNDROME Motorcycle valeting and paint protection specialist.
Aladinsaneuk wrote:andy is having a VERY heavy period

TwinNut

#9 Post by TwinNut » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:51 pm

I've tried it in my smoothness-is-everything quest and I noticed a small difference in that the bike did run slightly (say 5%) smoother, about the same difference as when I slotted in the K&N filter......I always use it now as I hardly get to use the bike due to work so the extra few pennies when filling up is never noticed, it certainly can't be any worse than std unleaded....or can it and I'm just insane?

User avatar
D-Rider
Admin
Admin
Posts: 15560
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:09 pm
Location: Coventry

#10 Post by D-Rider » Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:29 pm

TwinNut wrote:I've tried it in my smoothness-is-everything quest and I noticed a small difference in that the bike did run slightly (say 5%) smoother, about the same difference as when I slotted in the K&N filter......I always use it now as I hardly get to use the bike due to work so the extra few pennies when filling up is never noticed, it certainly can't be any worse than std unleaded....or can it and I'm just insane?
TN - what's the object of your smoothness is everything quest? Is it a general refinement or is it mainly to address the on/off effect at small throttle openings?

It's this small throttle opening stuff that annoys me most. I've not done much about it yet (apart from a 15t sprocket) but would like to sort it out. I'm thinking that a PCIII may be a key item .... but it aint cheap .....

Assuming that this is what you've been working on, what's worked for you?

:smt001

User avatar
Gio
Double World Champion
Posts: 6179
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: Chertsey

#11 Post by Gio » Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:12 am

Fausto wrote:
Gio wrote:I don't think you'd notice any improvement on a litre bike.
meaning that you would on a small bike OR on a larger bike ? :smt017
I can imagine if you're a shit hot rider on a 600 you might, by litre class I mean something of about that capacity and upwards. On my Blackbird I tried both standard unleaded and premium fuels, I couldn't spot any difference at all, it certainly didn't even give me more mileage either (which is one thing the oil companies bragged about) Image's

User avatar
Thumper
SuperSport Racer
SuperSport Racer
Posts: 400
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:45 am
Location: norfolk

#12 Post by Thumper » Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:37 am

I do notice the difference when I use Super unleaded fuel. it's small but my bike feels smother and the engine seems sweater and mileage from a tank is slightly better.
Commonly compression ratios were between 7.5-10 to 1 and 10 to one was considered a high compression ratio engine some years ago. These days petrol engines can have ratios in excess of 12 to 1 and run without lead additives things have improved with new engine design and better control using ECU's together with better additives.
I would always prefer to use Shell or BP fuels when filling my bike as the supermarket fuels can very in quality as recent events have proved.

Do any of you guys use an injector cleaner or fuel additives in your bike? opinions very as to their effectiveness but my seat of the pants dyno says yes. I use injector cleaner occasionally throughout the year when I service the bike or if the bike has been laid up for a time. :smt001
Always expect the unexpected

User avatar
Firestarter
Twisted Firestarter
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 8:28 am
Location: Northwich, Cheshire

#13 Post by Firestarter » Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:40 am

gazuk wrote:I believe Ride magazine did an article on this, and their conclusion was it did make a difference.
...but that the difference wasn't worth the extra cash, IIRC. Certainly for the increase tank range, it wasn't worth it. But then, who on here is bothered about tank range? :smt003

User avatar
Samray
Double World Champion
Posts: 6234
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:36 pm
Location: Riding round with Sheene and Simoncelli

#14 Post by Samray » Sat Mar 10, 2007 9:58 am

I did a diy controlled comparison some time ago and have used the 'super' since.
I also use Shell whenever it is available.

User avatar
loafersmate
Despatch Rider
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: Nr Gainsborough

#15 Post by loafersmate » Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:04 am

I seem to remember the evo magazine did a car test on the 'best' super unleaded using shell, esso and Tesco's 99RON. They tried it on a few different cars and it only made any real difference on a 250bhp impreza which gained ~20bhp on the dyno( using the tesco fuel!). It will only give a difference if the engine managment can adjust its timing to make use of the higher octane fuel. If you fill a car up that is designed to run on 99 you can feel a real performance drop if you use 95 (defo on my dad's Chimera). As far as I know the prilla ecu does not adjust so you'll get no performance change.
If you don't like it, don't look!

Post Reply