Yostwerks wrote:I posted some positive comments this week regarding my Falco's fit / finish on a Triumph forum.
A Triumph Sprint owner from London replied with the following......
My experience of Aprilia would be stay well away, unless you want unbelievably bad spares back up at extortionate prices,
where they are available. As for finish, frankly just laughable. Maybe in Italy or California where rain is seldom the paint stays on,
however in the UK the paint starts being pushed off by the corrosion underneath as soon as they reach our shore
Since this is predominantly a UK forum, would anyone like to comment on this ? How does Aprilia compare in this regard to Triumph.
Regards,
Tom
Well as regards spares - it's not brilliant - but it's better than it used to be. At one time spares were a big problem. Now most bits and pieces are readily available - though some things do come with a long delay ....
I guess that tends to be for parts that we might need less commonly. Either a call to several dealers sorts things out or someone on here has the bit you need. As I say, it could be better but it's generally OK now.
As for the build quality, the guy on the Triumph forum really has no clue what he's on about. Triumph make well put together bikes but they are certainly no better made than Aprilias.
My guess is he's of that "oh it's Italian, it must be poorly finished and rot away in 10 mins" attitude.
Aprilias aren't like that - you'd be hard-pressed to find better made bikes.
Mine is entering its 4th winter, is used daily and is seldom cleaned. A few bolt heads (mainly on the front brake calipers) show some surface corrosion but as for the rest of the bike, it's still lovely.
Others will tell you the same.