Difference between 2 Falcos i have owned

Chat for Falco Owners.

Moderators: Aladinsaneuk, MartDude, D-Rider, Moderators

Post Reply
Message
Author
gavhowe
Despatch Rider
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:19 am
Location: Buckingham

Difference between 2 Falcos i have owned

#1 Post by gavhowe » Fri May 02, 2008 11:01 am

I had a 1999 Falco, fitted with renegade chip / airkit , leo vinci cans. I them had a small mishap on the bike and wrote it off, I removed all the the parts and have since fitted them to a 2001 Falco I bought.

The later bike seems to have more power low down to mid range than the older bike, but seems a little down on power right at the top end. It could just be me though.

Were there any engine changes between the 2 years. I read about the airboot, but mine is the early style (the larger one)

I may have a go at balancing the TB's, do you think this could be it?

My only other thought is if the chip activates the CO pots and the previous bike could have had these adjusted as I bought it modified.


Thanks

Gav


Ps: Its great to be back on a Falco again.

User avatar
Fausto
SuperBike Racer
SuperBike Racer
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:04 pm
Location: Sunny Suffolk

#2 Post by Fausto » Fri May 02, 2008 2:08 pm

Ah, everybody knows that 2001 Falcos are the most powerful :smt003

I have no idea why there would be a difference but I have to say that the increases in power in the low and midrange would be preferable for me every time.

User avatar
Viking
SuperBike Racer
SuperBike Racer
Posts: 1207
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: The land down under

#3 Post by Viking » Sun May 04, 2008 12:27 pm

Didn't they make changes to the airbox intakes / snorkel things about that time?
It's the V-twin thing. There's just something about it that inline-4s don't have at all, and V-4s don't have enough of.

User avatar
Kwackerz
Admin
Admin
Posts: 8362
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:16 pm

#4 Post by Kwackerz » Sun May 04, 2008 12:39 pm

Differences can be down to how they were run in and what was fitted when they were run in.
Never ride faster than your guardian angel can fly

User avatar
Aladinsaneuk
Aprilia Admin
Posts: 9503
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:37 pm
Location: Webfoot territory

#5 Post by Aladinsaneuk » Sun May 04, 2008 4:17 pm

my pet theory is that some of the early falcos did actually have mille engines in

I could bore people with why, but I like it as a theory


Let's face it, you wouldn't go to a nurse to get good advice on a problem with a Falco - you'd choose an Engineer or a mechanic...


User avatar
minime
Track Day Addict
Track Day Addict
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 6:40 pm
Location: The Netherlands

#6 Post by minime » Sun May 04, 2008 7:26 pm

Aladinsaneuk wrote:my pet theory is that some of the early falcos did actually have mille engines in

I could bore people with why, but I like it as a theory
Pls do bore us to slow down our exiting lives. :smt003

User avatar
Thumper
SuperSport Racer
SuperSport Racer
Posts: 400
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:45 am
Location: norfolk

#7 Post by Thumper » Sun May 25, 2008 9:34 am

The later falco did get changes to reduce the power lose from fitting a cat the later engine was nearer the mille spec. I was told by an aprilia guy the valves are larger and the compression ratio a little higher. I don't know if the falco mille engine was fitted with the new designed cylinder heads with one spark plug per cylinder head but the engines otherwise are essentially the same with just small detail improvements such as a bigger oil filter etc.
Always expect the unexpected

Post Reply