Proof that the Police get hammered when they get it wrong
Moderators: Aladinsaneuk, MartDude, D-Rider, Moderators
Proof that the Police get hammered when they get it wrong
Proof that the Police are prosecuted and hit harder than many others when they get it wrong Thankfully the Moped rider and the pedestrians involved all made a full recover
http://www.policeoracle.com/news/invest ... um=twitter
http://www.policeoracle.com/news/invest ... um=twitter
It is better to arrive 30 seconds late in this world than 30 years early in the next
Sorry, I forget that it is a site that you have to sign into.fatboy wrote:Unable to read the whole report, was obscured by 'Police Oracle 'stuff, read the salient part, suspended sentence.
Surely if this had involved your average 'civvy' then it would be case of dont forget your toothbrush ?
He was fined £4,200, disqualified from driving for 30 months, which along with the 15 month suspended prison sentance he is being hammered compared with most drivers convicted pf the same offence.
He is subject to an internal disciplinary hearing as well which is where he will probably lose his job which also means that he will lose his pension as well which based on my Police pension is substantial not forgetting his lump sum which is many thousands of pounds.
It is better to arrive 30 seconds late in this world than 30 years early in the next
That puts things into context,fair punishmentT.C. wrote:Sorry, I forget that it is a site that you have to sign into.fatboy wrote:Unable to read the whole report, was obscured by 'Police Oracle 'stuff, read the salient part, suspended sentence.
Surely if this had involved your average 'civvy' then it would be case of dont forget your toothbrush ?
He was fined £4,200, disqualified from driving for 30 months, which along with the 15 month suspended prison sentance he is being hammered compared with most drivers convicted pf the same offence.
He is subject to an internal disciplinary hearing as well which is where he will probably lose his job which also means that he will lose his pension as well which based on my Police pension is substantial not forgetting his lump sum which is many thousands of pounds.
Cleverly disguised as an adult !
They don't lose it, they just don't receive it until they reach age 65, which bearingin mnd that someone who joined at 18 can retire at 48.BikerGran wrote:I've always been a bit confused about that 'losing the pension' thing when people are dismissed from the police - surely they can't deprive someone of their own money THEY have paid into their pension?
Put it into persective, I retired at 43, (albeit on a medical pension) my lump sum was around £x amount and it was index linked from day one.
Thos guy will not get the lump sum, he will not have it index linked and he may have to wait several years before he actually starts to get his retirement pension
It is better to arrive 30 seconds late in this world than 30 years early in the next
Following on from this, someone has got some explaining to do. Nothing a bit of Gaffa tape and T Cut won't put right though.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... round.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... round.html
It is better to arrive 30 seconds late in this world than 30 years early in the next