I'm going to call them anyway and see what I can negotiate, I've got a collection of Falco ads at close to what I value the bike at, so they will help back up my claim should I not be happy with their offer.
watch this space

Moderators: Aladinsaneuk, MartDude, D-Rider, Moderators
Stop being logical.Kwackerz wrote:Why they continue to push the new for old I dont know. the industry as a whole could save squillions if they had an option for repair using age related parts where applicable.
wayno wrote:I can understand that they have to quote using only new parts, you wouldn't want a wahsing machine repaired with secondhand parts so why should they use secondhand on bikes.
Apple Mac Boy wrote: if they were to do a repair job, and use old parts that then failed - where is the warrenty?
viking wrote:Stop being logical.
The problem is that there is no definitive way of proving or disproving whiplash. As the doctors don't want to spend hours arguing about it with someone who wants to make a quick £5k they just give them some pills and send them on their way saying they do have it.D-Rider wrote:I really struggle to understand how such claims get through unless these systems are badly designed (which they are not)
Damn - that'll include me then.wayno wrote: As a friend of mine always says, people who make personal injury claims should be forced to where a hi-vis vest, a hard hat with a rotating light on top and have a carer with them 24 hours a day.