THIS IS PROB ANOTHER STOOPID QUESTION

All non-motorcycle related chat in here

Moderators: Aladinsaneuk, MartDude, D-Rider, Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
mangocrazy
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3944
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:24 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

#16 Post by mangocrazy » Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:43 pm

D-Rider wrote:A number of us with the Mille system have the link pipe mods that improve bottom end and mid range - from power curves I've seen to probably better levels than the Falco 2-into-1-into-2.
I'm glad that the important word 'probably' was deployed in that wish-fulfillment sentence... :smt003

All that effort, just to get back to close to where you were as standard... :smt002

I think we ought to organise a dyno shootout between D-Rider's Mille-stylee bolide, a Falco with standard headers and aftermarket cans, and my Falco with it's non-balanced 2 into 2 exhaust and Akra cans. No fancy inlet mods or 54mm T/Bs - a straight exhaust shootout.

Whaddya fink?

User avatar
D-Rider
Admin
Admin
Posts: 15560
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:09 pm
Location: Coventry

#17 Post by D-Rider » Tue Jan 10, 2012 7:41 pm

mangocrazy wrote:
All that effort, just to get back to close to where you were as standard... :smt002
No - the effort was to improve (subjective, obviously) the aesthetics
“Scientists investigate that which already is. Engineers create that which has never been.”
-- Albert Einstein

User avatar
mangocrazy
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3944
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:24 pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

#18 Post by mangocrazy » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:13 pm

Just a spot of gentle ribbing, Andy (as I'm sure you're aware...)

I would seriously be interested in doing some comparative Dyno testing, though...

User avatar
D-Rider
Admin
Admin
Posts: 15560
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:09 pm
Location: Coventry

#19 Post by D-Rider » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:14 pm

mangocrazy wrote:Just a spot of gentle ribbing, Andy (as I'm sure you're aware...)

I would seriously be interested in doing some comparative Dyno testing, though...
Yes and Yes :smt003
“Scientists investigate that which already is. Engineers create that which has never been.”
-- Albert Einstein

User avatar
HowardQ
World Champion
Posts: 3921
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, England

#20 Post by HowardQ » Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:02 am

D-Rider wrote:
HowardQ wrote:Most people know I am a twin pipe fan, but here are some simple facts. (Why make it look like a IL4?, but Andy is right it does save on the cost of cans and is slightly lighter.)
The twin pipes on the Falco, (plus other changes actually did give it a slightly better low to mid range than the Mille for a slight loss at the top end and this was done to change the character slightly, and, as V Twins are all about mid range thump, I reckon this is more use on the road than a very slight increase in outright power.
If you want a screaming top end get an IL4, they are great at it!

(Aprilia Fact).
The most expensive and highest performance version of the original Mille variations was the "Edwards" and one of the things they did to it to give it a bit of a performance boost to help justify all the extra cost, was to fit twin pipes!
NUFF SAID!
Howard ..... you seem to be mixing your argument here.

Firstly you say the Falco twin pipes give a better low-down to mid-range characteristic and then you say the twin akras help the Edwards rep to achieve an ultimately higher overall power (ie top-end)
:smt017

Also ... as a point to be aware of, the Edwards rep was not built with performance goodies - it was essentially a standard Mille with some paint. However, it was delivered with a race kit for owners to fit or leave in the box (57mm TBs and twin Akras) ... twin cans supplied for racing - not for better road manners.
(That said, I don't think we can compare a set of akras with a standard aprilia can)

A number of us with the Mille system have the link pipe mods that improve bottom end and mid range - from power curves I've seen to probably better levels than the Falco 2-into-1-into-2.

Whatever, I've not done it for performance but because it looks better - showing off the lovelly mille swingarm and either Gold OZs or Carbon BST wheels - depending on which I have on there at the time.

:smt003
Sorry Andy, but you are not reading my words, even though you quoted them, (and you know I really like what you have done to your bike).
I mentioned the Falco had a bit more mid range but a slight loss at the top end compared with the Mille, but in the case of the "Edwards Rep" I said as you quoted me, "one of the things they did to it to give it a bit of a performance boost to help justify all the extra cost".
(and I was talking about the bike with all the extra kit fitted). They had already boosted the top end a fair bit, but probably lost a bit of mid range doing that, so they again went for the accepted way of giving it some mid range back, i.e. twin pipes.
(Can't comment on what difference balance pipes make on a Mille system, but agree that Graham's suggestion might be fun).
All this is a bit tongue in cheek I know, but as I have said before, the great thing about the Falco is we all like to change things in our own way and you have gone for a top end boost and a great looking bike. Nothing wrong with that, but I went a different way. I kept the Falco a bit more standard, as I love the mid range just as it ends up with a set of cans and a K&N to help it breath, (get rid of the flatspot), and make it sound like a Falco should.
I then spent probably a similar wedge as you have spent on mods on another bike with a lot more top end, (150 brake at the flywheel), than any Falco, or Mille will ever have.
Simple reason is that I want to experience something different alongside the Falco before I finally have to pack it in, (I'm an old bastard, and have been biking for 48 years).
I find the top end power of the lighter Kwack mind warping, (Feck knows what the BMW S1000RR feels like). I have ridden faster bikes but not had chance to ride them as hard as the Kwack, (0 to 100 in around 6.5 secs will do for me thanks!).
Trouble is that with any of these, you have to get them to very silly speeds before you get the real thrills from them. I love both my bikes but, with the Falco, the smile still starts when I fire it up and ride up our road and I get a lot bigger thrills at lower speeds.
It's my perfect bike and nothing could ever replace it!
HowardQ

Take a ride on the Dark Side :smt004 :smt096 :smt004

2001 Aprilia Falco in Black
2002 Kawasaki ZX9R F1P

User avatar
D-Rider
Admin
Admin
Posts: 15560
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:09 pm
Location: Coventry

#21 Post by D-Rider » Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:17 am

HowardQ wrote: the great thing about the Falco is we all like to change things in our own way and you have gone for a top end boost
Nooo - I haven't gone for a top end boost - the bike (almost) never gets ridden up there. That has never been my objective.
Indeed, when I changed to the 2:1 system I noticed no drop in mid-range or bottom end (once I'd got the fuelling sorted ... well, maybe not sorted but greatly improved) and I couldn't tell you how the top end compares.
There appear to be plenty of Falco twin-exhaust users that can't hold high gears around town but with my "compromised" 2:1 system, the bike is happy below 30mph in 6th.

As I say, I've not done it for power, I'm far more interested in rideability - particularly at the bottom end - and I'm more than happy with that. I'm hoping that the new mid section will improve that further (though I've not yet had the opportunity to ride with it).
However the real reason for the change is I prefer the aesthetics.
Last edited by D-Rider on Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
“Scientists investigate that which already is. Engineers create that which has never been.”
-- Albert Einstein

User avatar
Aladinsaneuk
Aprilia Admin
Posts: 9503
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:37 pm
Location: Webfoot territory

#22 Post by Aladinsaneuk » Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:36 am

i wish i could help out dyno wise... but i think i may be over fettled!


Let's face it, you wouldn't go to a nurse to get good advice on a problem with a Falco - you'd choose an Engineer or a mechanic...


User avatar
HowardQ
World Champion
Posts: 3921
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, England

#23 Post by HowardQ » Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:40 pm

Aladinsaneuk wrote:i wish i could help out dyno wise... but i think i may be over fettled!
You should be so lucky mate!
HowardQ

Take a ride on the Dark Side :smt004 :smt096 :smt004

2001 Aprilia Falco in Black
2002 Kawasaki ZX9R F1P

User avatar
MartDude
Admin
Admin
Posts: 2857
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:36 am
Location: South Shropshire

#24 Post by MartDude » Wed Jan 11, 2012 2:58 pm

Aladinsaneuk wrote:i wish i could help out dyno wise... but i think i may be over fettled!
That's not what Hanna says . . .
It flies sideways through time
It's an electric line
To your zodiac sign
I've got a Black and Silver Machine!

User avatar
Samray
Double World Champion
Posts: 6234
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:36 pm
Location: Riding round with Sheene and Simoncelli

#25 Post by Samray » Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:20 pm

THIS IS PROB ANOTHER STOOPID QUESTION
As you can see, you definately asked on the right site then. :smt003
In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular.

Post Reply