Page 1 of 1
F1 vs Blade vs Powerboat
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:11 pm
by Kwackerz
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 8:03 pm
by Gio
No its not. the funny thing is the boat would have won on power to weight, but water is a terrible moving object, the car would come second with the bike last, airodynamics play no part in this as its just .25 of a mile.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:29 pm
by D-Rider
Dunno about the boat but ...
Car .... "prototype" Premier racing series vehicle
Bike .... production-based series racing bike
Not saying a MotoGP bike would have won but it may have been a more comparable basis for this stunt.
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 9:51 pm
by Kwackerz
The fact the bike was a proddy, against a wholly race derived car did raise a smile.
They obviously were too scared to bring a BTCC car instead...
As for the boat, well...
That was just taking photos wasnt it?

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:10 am
by Gio
Was just thinking, they should have brought the rocket car (the one the Hamster had his prang in).
That'd have made the F1 car look like a sunday drivers mode of transport

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 3:14 pm
by Fausto
Don't know much about boats but once saw some Formula something or other racing on Windermere. They were small flat bottomed things - pretty much rode on top of the water and avoided any displacement/drag problems - and I was stunned at how fast they were. We sat behind the startline looking at the line up from the rear and when the flag went up there was just a great wall of water and then you saw them flick round the first buoy. It seemed to defy physics. I recall some talk at the time that they were faster off the line than F1 cars.... but for how long?
Anyway I was impressed and watched all aftetrnoon..... aided by hot sunshine and a nearby pub

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 3:35 pm
by Samray
Gio wrote:No its not. the funny thing is the boat would have won on power to weight, but water is a terrible moving object, the car would come second with the bike last, airodynamics play no part in this as its just .25 of a mile.
You'd probably have seen em all off on yer pushbike then.

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:39 pm
by Gio
Samray wrote:Gio wrote:No its not. the funny thing is the boat would have won on power to weight, but water is a terrible moving object, the car would come second with the bike last, airodynamics play no part in this as its just .25 of a mile.
You'd probably have seen em all off on yer pushbike then.

I wish, top speed I've managed so far is 31mph, downhill with tail wind

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:49 pm
by Samray
Considered trying a double bubble?

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:09 pm
by Gio
I bet you'd like to see that
