Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:46 pm
by Firestarter
mangocrazy wrote:Firestarter wrote:they've got a bit of a colour cast (a bit yellow), but it gives the pics a bit of an ambience
Fluorescent lights are notoriously difficult to photgraph things under. Especially as one tube can have a different spectral response to another. Looks like the editing software has coped pretty well with the whole bike pics, but has gone a tad yellow on the close-ups. Still looks bloody good though.
Yep, the cast looks good and suits the pics, wasn't sure if it was deliberate (with a filter) or how it came out the camera
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:28 pm
by hornetrider
I approve of this post.
Question, what's that thing just behind the swingarm pivot? Looks... blue-ish?
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 9:49 am
by D-Rider
hornetrider wrote:I approve of this post.
Question, what's that thing just behind the swingarm pivot? Looks... blue-ish?
I think it might be the APHI device (Aprilia Patented Handling Inhibitor).
They fitted them to give other bikes a chance to keep up. Not sure it worked.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:40 am
by furygan man
Excellent angles and depth of field, good location to, makes a difference to all the 'driveway' shoots of which we are all guilty off!!
You also ought to try taking them at 1600 or 3200 ISO if you have a DSLR, the 'noise' actually adds to the feel of the thing especially if it is low light/stormy
Nice pics
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:59 pm
by HowardQ
Well chosen location and great photos of a really nice looking bike.
Just about sums it up