Bigger brakes fitted!

General Aprilia banter

Moderators: Aladinsaneuk, MartDude, D-Rider, Moderators

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Tweaker
Clubman Racer
Clubman Racer
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Huddersfield
Main bike: BMW R1250RS

Bigger brakes fitted!

#1 Post by Tweaker » Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:12 pm

So, fitted the Mille forks and 320mm rotors to the Fut a couple of weeks ago. All I can say is, why oh why did Aprilia choose to fit smaller brakes to a heavier bike intended for 2 up touring? :smt009

The braking from anything over 50mph inspires so much more confidence and is a mod I would heartily recommend.

On the subject of mods, is there any noticeable difference with changing the air box for the early Mille version or is it better to go the Evo route (assuming it fits)?

Ta.
The ride is the reason ........ the destination is just the excuse.

User avatar
blinkey501
World Champion
Posts: 3495
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 6:28 pm
Location: near doncaster

Re: Bigger brakes fitted!

#2 Post by blinkey501 » Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:30 pm

Tweaker wrote:
On the subject of mods, is there any noticeable difference with changing the air box for the early Mille version or is it better to go the Evo route (assuming it fits)?

Ta.
Fit a renegade air box instead of a mille one... Job sorted :smt023

User avatar
MartDude
Admin
Admin
Posts: 2857
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:36 am
Location: South Shropshire

#3 Post by MartDude » Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:08 am

Have the slightly shorter Mille forks made a noticeable difference to the handling?

As regards the airbox- from what I've read, just fiddling with the airbox/boot makes at best a slight difference. You need a full-on Evo/Rene/Hooked airbox mod , plus PCIII/Tuneboy/TuneEdit + dyno faffing to make a real difference. And adjusting the cam timing - slotting the cam gears - is said to provide the a more significant performance improvement.

I toyed for a while with the idea of an airbox mod, but for most of the riding I do, a smaller front sprocket and a BMC air filter, with the fuelling etc set up by Griff, has provided a value-for-money improvement. The BMC filter hasn't improved top-end performance, but, IMHO, it's made the bike rather smoother in the mid-range


PS. Will you be able to make it to the marches Meet?
It flies sideways through time
It's an electric line
To your zodiac sign
I've got a Black and Silver Machine!

User avatar
Tweaker
Clubman Racer
Clubman Racer
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Huddersfield
Main bike: BMW R1250RS

#4 Post by Tweaker » Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:57 am

Thanks for the replies.

Blinkey. I prefer the sealed airbox, Evo style, which I had on the Falco and worked really well.
I've got the TuneECU software and used that to upload the 05 map, which made a noticable difference. I might have a play around with it sometime to see if I can get the best from Zorstec cans.

MD. Haven't really noticed any difference in the handling. I expected the turn in to be a bit quicker but I can't honestly say I can feel any change. As far as I could tell, there's only a few mm difference in length anyway and that can be lost in fitting the forks slightly lower in the yokes. BTW, the 15T is on the shelf in the garage waiting to be fitted :smt001

Unfortunately, I won't be able to make to Marches meet due to a clash of hobbies - we're off diving that weekend :smt041
Hope the weather is good and you all have a great time. It would be good to catch up with you all sometime though.
The ride is the reason ........ the destination is just the excuse.

Post Reply