Page 1 of 2

mpg with 15T front and 42T rear - 48mpg

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 7:42 am
by ReggieGasket
I've changed my gearing from stock (16F 41R) to 15F 42R. I was abit worried I would loose some mpg on my motorway commute. First figures in - 48mpg. 5k in top has dropped from around 80 to 75 (I think). But is the speedo accurate now? I was getting about 50mpg before, so I'm happy :smt003

Goes like stink.

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 8:09 am
by anzacinexile
Dont worry about the speedo - its not affected by gearing (pickup is of the back wheel).

Didn't notice any difference in MPG when I did mine. I know the motors spinning faster so should burn more but to counter that, its not working so hard at a given speed so burns less

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 8:14 am
by Falco9
And don't forget one of the best side effects of the lowered gearing

Wheelies :smt003 :smt003 :smt003

F9 :smt006

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 8:17 am
by ReggieGasket
I'm too chicken to try wheelies yet!

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 8:22 am
by ReggieGasket
Oh, and by the way, have changed to a 520 chain. That's what the racers use. Before you tell me it will snap, my brother had a Gixer thou with 150hp which used this type of chain. He got over 10k miles out of it. It'll get a real work out at Anglesea on sunday, so we'll see if it can take the Falco power...

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 8:42 am
by Aladinsaneuk
with respect mate = this is a v twin lump with the kind of torque that makes in line fours scream.....

i think we have discussed this a lot in the past and i think the concensus was stick with standard size

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 10:50 am
by ReggieGasket
Let's see. Mille racers would use a 520. It won't snap (famous last words). It might stretch too quickly to be practical.

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 12:02 pm
by dyzio
Slightly off topic but why do people put the 520 on the Falco? What's wrong with the 525?

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 12:06 pm
by D-Rider
dyzio wrote:Slightly off topic but why do people put the 520 on the Falco? What's wrong with the 525?
I doubt that many do.
It's a bit lighter

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 12:13 pm
by dyzio
D-Rider wrote: It's a bit lighter


Does that make a huge difference?

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 12:48 pm
by Aladinsaneuk
imho for falcos - nope

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 12:55 pm
by dyzio
Is it even noticeable in road riding?

Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 12:58 pm
by D-Rider
Doubt it - though I've never tried one and am very unlikely to.

Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 9:23 am
by ReggieGasket
My understanding is there is a significant weight saving, but I don't know how much. I'll let you know how it goes, but I think it would be difficult to feel the difference when riding. A 520 chain is an option for the Mille on the B&C Express website, so it's clearly a reasonable option. I probably wouldn't have bothered unless my brother had a chain in his garage he didn't need any more.

Re: mpg with 15T front and 42T rear - 48mpg

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:02 am
by GRFalco
ReggieGasket wrote:I've changed my gearing from stock (16F 41R) to 15F 42R. I was abit worried I would loose some mpg on my motorway commute. First figures in - 48mpg. 5k in top has dropped from around 80 to 75 (I think). But is the speedo accurate now? I was getting about 50mpg before, so I'm happy :smt003

Goes like stink.
I think this is the same combination that I've got.