Page 1 of 1

Different linkage plates?

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 1:33 pm
by Chabby
So.....in the quest for better handling/less money in my bank balance I decided to upgrade the standard blue spring shock to a later yellow Mille type.
I trawled the internet, bidding and losing on several before obtaining one in good condition at a price I was prepared to pay.
Part 2 of the task lay ahead of me - the appropriate linkage/dogbone combo.
This took me even longer than the shock had and after a few 'pipped at the post' experiences I ended up paying over the odds for one that, on arrival, I discovered needed all new bearings,seals and two pins to boot. Still....I had what I wanted.
Two weeks later, trawling the web again, I see another linkage advertised as a 'buy it now' for approx one third of what I paid for mine - advertised as being from a Tuono but as I now know, still compatible with the Mille shock.
Too much of a bargain to resist so I bought it and when it arrived it is perfect with recent new/bearings and seals.
I took it into the garage to compare and it is identical to the one I already have......... except the side plates are thinner by about 2mm.
I wondered about this as I'd never read of different types being available. Later that day, a mate called and I pointed out the difference and wondered aloud why. After hefting the two and comparing them, he stated what should have been obvious earlier but I'd missed totally........the thinner set are steel as opposed to alloy.
Other than that both look identical with the factory arrows stamped on etc.
So that's a new one on me and gives me a dilemma......which would be the best to use and why the different types? :smt017

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 1:45 pm
by Falcopops
Use the lightest set, so you can go faster :smt003

Re: Different linkage plates?

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 1:58 pm
by D-Rider
Chabby wrote: Part 2 of the task lay ahead of me - the appropriate linkage/dogbone combo.
......................................
I took it into the garage to compare and it is identical to the one I already have......... except the side plates are thinner by about 2mm.
I wondered about this as I'd never read of different types being available. Later that day, a mate called and I pointed out the difference and wondered aloud why. After hefting the two and comparing them, he stated what should have been obvious earlier but I'd missed totally........the thinner set are steel as opposed to alloy.
Other than that both look identical with the factory arrows stamped on etc.
So that's a new one on me and gives me a dilemma......which would be the best to use and why the different types? :smt017
LOL yeah .... I reported this 3 years ago - keep up! :smt002

https://www.ridersite.com/viewtopic.ph ... angles+6mm

I think the alloy ones were probably for the "R" variant.

Re: Different linkage plates?

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 2:45 pm
by Chabby
LOL yeah .... I reported this 3 years ago - keep up! :smt002

https://www.ridersite.com/viewtopic.ph ... angles+6mm

I think the alloy ones were probably for the "R" variant

Soz - I wasn't in the Falco fold then and my search skills obviously aren't up to scratch!

I know there was some talk on the Mille site that linkages could fail.......All the failed one's I've seen photos of look like the alloy so I'm thinking I'll go with steel.

The weight difference is about the same as having a haircut
.

Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 2:52 pm
by D-Rider
LOL yeah - wasn't complaining at you.

I have heard of triangles failing - but the only ones I'm aware of are the ones from the newer shaped RSVRs 04 onwards. (That said, I'm not guaranteeing anything about any others)

They are far less substantial and a different geometry.

I posted some pictures of this a while back - including a picture of one that had failed. Take a look at my last post on the following thread:
https://www.ridersite.com/viewtopic.ph ... e&start=16