Page 1 of 1
BMF calls for justice
Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 9:36 pm
by BikerGran
Apparently it's alright for an HGV driver to be over the centre line of the road, but not for a motorcyclist to ride anywhere near it even if he's on his own side.
http://www.bmf.co.uk/pages/news.php?fullstory=1070
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Home/A- ... 052012.htm
Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 10:12 pm
by D-Rider
Crazy and outrageous decision. This takes "the law is an ass" to a new level.
That said, what on earth possessed the rider to admit that he was partly liable as he agreed he wasn't appropriately positioned - despite being in a place he was completely entitled to be and who knows how ideal the position was or wasn't as we are not given enough info.
That ridiculous admission has led to a judgement that could be used as a precedent against any of us.
I hope the BMF pursue and win this one for all of us
Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 10:15 pm
by Kwackerz
What the fek was Whiteford on about?! He proper shot himself and others when they use his as an example, in the foot.
'Your dance space, my dance space.' simple as. Road position is irrelevant. You're allowed to travel at any position in your lane.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 10:25 pm
by Aladinsaneuk
I suspect the actual question and answer was not as reported
Case stinks though
Posted: Mon May 14, 2012 11:06 pm
by D-Rider
Aladinsaneuk wrote:I suspect the actual question and answer was not as reported
Case stinks though
Even so, what on earth was his lawyer doing by not advising him in the implications of answering in a way that could be construed to mean it like that?!
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 5:03 pm
by BikerGran
The lawyer was probably a non-biker too - always pays to go to bike specialists that understand the situation.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 5:18 pm
by fatboy
Shocking,disgusting, almost beyond belief
What is blatantly clear is that many people involved are of no use whatso ever to the justice system.
If the lorry was too wide for that particular section of road then an 'outrider' should have been used to warn adancing traffic, as you would see in front of a combined harvester
Surely this ruling is as water tight as a sieve
Too high a standard imposed on the lorry driver? FFS you should be able to drive to the highest standard to drive the fucking thing safely
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 5:53 pm
by Willopotomas
I expect all drivers of any vehicle and all riders to drive to an exceptional standard. Unfortunately, they don't, which is why I have eye's looking out the hole in my arse when driving. The standard of driving and riding in this country is appalling, but this takes the piss.. I really don't know how some people sleep at night.

Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 2:15 pm
by Gio
Willopotomas wrote:The standard of driving and riding in this country is appalling
You sir are being generous. 90% of the drivers in this country shouldn'd be allowed a bicycle, let alone be in charge of a motorised vehicle.
Also the gentleman in question looks a few marbles short.
The BMF should let this go, after all he admitted culpability. Its cut and dried
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 2:25 pm
by D-Rider
Gio wrote:
You sir are being generous. 90% of the drivers in this country shouldn'd be allowed a bicycle
.... and as at least 90% of them don't ride a bicycle, self regulation seems to be winning on that part of the debate
