
I like the bit on yours (real men ride twins) I've got a twin, but its not a 'prilia, do I qualify?

Moderators: Aladinsaneuk, MartDude, D-Rider, Moderators
Now there's a point for academic debate.Kwackerz wrote:No. It's not a V configuration.
Haven't you heard of a 270° v twin?Kwackerz wrote:It wouldnt be a 180 V Twin so much as a flat..twin.. so Yes, you have most definately lost the plot.
...so that when opening the throttle quickly you don't get torque steer
...Which is why V's were used in the first place.
it's got naff all to do with the config of VHowever, many motorcycle manufacturers have corrected for torque reaction by rotating the transmission input shafts and/or the balance and drive shafts opposite that of the crankshaft so that there is approximately equal mass turning clockwise and counterclockwise at any time, thereby physically canceling the effect.
Think of an upside down V90.Kwackerz wrote:What the hell has 270 degrees got to do with 180?
![]()
...so that when opening the throttle quickly you don't get torque steer
...Which is why V's were used in the first place.
Proof?
Lifted off http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxer_engi ... _V_enginesnormally a 180 degree V12
Ferrari actually.Kwackerz wrote:Dunno. I know the RSV (and I assume therefore the Flakko) have double balancing shafts.. Ducatis use them..
Theyre not a new thing, if thats what you mean?
I still cannot see how a 180 degree piston config can be referred to as a 'V'.. Typical bloody mindedness from BMW.....