White van man.

All non-motorcycle related chat in here

Moderators: Aladinsaneuk, MartDude, D-Rider, Moderators

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Samray
Double World Champion
Posts: 6234
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:36 pm
Location: Riding round with Sheene and Simoncelli

White van man.

#1 Post by Samray » Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:44 pm

PC Glen Dennis told the Hull Daily Mail: "In my time as a police officer, this is the worst case of dangerous driving I have come across."
:smt017
Looks like a normal day at the office to me. :smt012

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=034_1214515049

fastasfcuk
SuperBike Racer
SuperBike Racer
Posts: 1424
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

#2 Post by fastasfcuk » Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:05 pm

what a f-ing idiot, it's never tw-s like that that get wiped out. thank god no one was comeing the other way let alone a biker. :smt013

User avatar
Kwackerz
Admin
Admin
Posts: 8362
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:16 pm

#3 Post by Kwackerz » Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:38 pm

Ive seen worse!!

Points to note:

1. It's a *edit* Merc Sprinter.. It sits a lot higher than a car and the driver has a better field of vision than many. I would happily hazard a guess he could see a fair way further than Plod could.

2. The road was clear, no panic braking anywhere (to avoid oncoming traffic) no squirrels were killed in the making of that video although a few feathers were ruffled.



Thats not dangerous driving, nobody was endangered by his overtaking, it is just that he stayed over on the opposite side of the road longer than is normal.

Ask Cambridgeshire Police about dangerous driving.. their advanced car courses regularly have close shaves in our area. Nobody gets hung or drawn there..
Last edited by Kwackerz on Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Never ride faster than your guardian angel can fly

User avatar
Kwackerz
Admin
Admin
Posts: 8362
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:16 pm

#4 Post by Kwackerz » Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:43 pm

Also he pulled over to let the bike past, it didnt, so he indicated and carried on.. He was clearly aware of his surroundings?
Never ride faster than your guardian angel can fly

fastasfcuk
SuperBike Racer
SuperBike Racer
Posts: 1424
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

#5 Post by fastasfcuk » Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:09 pm

sorry Kwackerz got to disagree, what your saying is if you sit high enough you can drive how you want to,i do'nt know how you can see in front when your on a long sweeping bend. did'nt he have a van in front of him when he pulled out then cut him up.

User avatar
Samray
Double World Champion
Posts: 6234
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:36 pm
Location: Riding round with Sheene and Simoncelli

#6 Post by Samray » Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:42 pm

overtaking eight cars at once
diving in and out of traffic at high speed
Make your mind up !
passing cars on blind bends
Not in that clip when offsiding, tho the bike was blind.
at over 60mph
Is that 61 or 161?

Certainly not as dangerous as things we all see every day, tho the copper rode like a twat imho.

User avatar
Kwackerz
Admin
Admin
Posts: 8362
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:16 pm

#7 Post by Kwackerz » Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:56 pm

Hmm 36 seconds, shows him pulling in and there are still vehicles out overtaking, he obviously pulls in as he hasnt a safe view..

Then there's a big jump that gives a false impression,

I'll give you the van at 46 secs was maybe shoving in somewhat, but the overtake after? watching it full screen he can see the van that pulls out prior to him and the road, then as he is alongside the truck he has a clear view of round that bend as it straightens out. He pulls in in plenty of time then the oncoming car seemingly flashing the police bike that is overtaking at speed at the time.
Never ride faster than your guardian angel can fly

User avatar
Gio
Double World Champion
Posts: 6179
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: Chertsey

#8 Post by Gio » Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:05 pm

What bends were there? a very fast left hander and he didn't overtake until he could see past the vehicle in front.

I've spent far longer on the "wrong " side of the road when overtaking, even on a motorbike, I think plod in this case is an arsehole, got nothing better to do that not hunt proper criminals.

User avatar
Kwackerz
Admin
Admin
Posts: 8362
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:16 pm

#9 Post by Kwackerz » Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:20 pm

:smt017 Why are we defending a WVM?
Never ride faster than your guardian angel can fly

User avatar
Samray
Double World Champion
Posts: 6234
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:36 pm
Location: Riding round with Sheene and Simoncelli

#10 Post by Samray » Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:28 pm

Just proving what a pillock he was.......... he pleaded guilty. :smt002







Mine's red :smt003

User avatar
Kwackerz
Admin
Admin
Posts: 8362
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 6:16 pm

#11 Post by Kwackerz » Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:43 pm

fastasfcuk wrote: did'nt he have a van in front of him when he pulled out then cut him up.


I know what youre saying, it appears from our camera angle that he cut the smaller van with the ladders on the roof(?) up, -but there again, the guy in the small van.. coming home or going to work, slow moving traffic, not paying much attention.. doesnt notice our WVM until he pulls in, flashes him and brakes..

Now my normal reaction seeing a huge van coming into a position like that, were he to be liable to cut me up, would be to start pulling back before he got there as I knew he'd not get in and would probably try to. (sods law) But the guy didnt and our WVM slotted in with room to spare. Im not definate that he didnt have enough room.. ok you couldnt apply the 2 second rule, but you couldnt to ANY of those vehicles we saw.
I think little WVM with the ladders simply wasnt paying attention then broke and flashed as a reaction to suddenly seeing a big WVM in front of him, -a reaction rather than a warning.. if you see what im bumbling on about! It gives an impression he was cut up, but i dont think it was a proper sliced up jobbie.
Never ride faster than your guardian angel can fly

Post Reply