The other cost of living

All non-motorcycle related chat in here

Moderators: Aladinsaneuk, MartDude, D-Rider, Moderators

Post Reply
Message
Author
fatboy
World Champion
Posts: 3774
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:48 pm
Location: BATH

The other cost of living

#1 Post by fatboy » Sun Mar 16, 2014 7:57 pm

Covering a period of 61 days Oct/Nov 2013, M.P.'s made 3,300 expenses claims.
Average 541 claims daily
Average total daily claim £73,300.
Total claim for period £4,5,000000

Source Independant Parlimentary Standards Association, via VoxPolitical
Cleverly disguised as an adult !

User avatar
D-Rider
Admin
Admin
Posts: 15560
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:09 pm
Location: Coventry

#2 Post by D-Rider » Sun Mar 16, 2014 8:21 pm

It's obviously a lot of money but then I do expect that running government is not a cheap thing to do. Travel back and forth to constituencies or accommodation while away from home on parliamentary duties plus overseas travel for those whose jobs take them there is not going to come cheap.
I know that from my expense claims (which are always for cheap economy flights and not very generous subsistence allowances).

So yes it might seem a lot but without a lot more information it's impossible to tell whether it's reasonable or not.
“Scientists investigate that which already is. Engineers create that which has never been.”
-- Albert Einstein

lazarus
SuperSport Racer
SuperSport Racer
Posts: 608
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 5:22 pm

#3 Post by lazarus » Wed Mar 19, 2014 9:24 pm

How does 61 days times 73300 make 45 million?

Anyway there are 574 MPs with constituencies outside London so divide them into the 73k and you get £127 per man. If I had to stay in London to do business, my expenses would certainly be at least that figure if not more. A 3 star hotel averages £90 per night and you have to ass food and transport.

User avatar
Dalemac
Midnight Rider
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:20 am

#4 Post by Dalemac » Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:02 am

The thing that annoys me is these people are paid to do a job. Their job includes lots of travelling. It's part of their job.

Why should they be able to claim back for what is essentially part of their job. They are paid to do the job and that is meant to cover their cost of living, just like a job in any other field of work does. And as we all know being an MP is hardly underpaid...

The problem is they view their pay packets as pure profit! they don't want to pay for anything out of their own pocket - they expect to be able to live off expenses and their pay packet goes to....who knows where.

We're all in it together.

User avatar
D-Rider
Admin
Admin
Posts: 15560
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:09 pm
Location: Coventry

#5 Post by D-Rider » Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:52 am

No, sorry Dale but you've got it completely wrong. In any job where you travel on business, the business pays the costs. There will be limits to what you can claim but this is normal practice.

I certainly could not hope to pay for my own business travel. (this is different to communing costs of course)

You say MPs are over paid. TBH I think that if anything they are underpaid. What I object to is those with a lot of outside business interests using a significant proportion of their time on those external interests and raking in huge additional salaries.
“Scientists investigate that which already is. Engineers create that which has never been.”
-- Albert Einstein

robbier6
Clubman Racer
Clubman Racer
Posts: 329
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:50 am
Location: hertfordshire

#6 Post by robbier6 » Thu Mar 20, 2014 12:30 pm

I have to agree with D-Rider.

I worked away a lot and was supplied with a company credit card for my subsistence, i obviously couldn't buy expensive meals or booze, i think there was an unofficial £30 limit for food and drink but if you think about it try spending £30 on two courses and 3 beers in a beef eater and you're almost there.

Though i will agree that rather than second homes in london for mp's within say an hours commute or 40mile radius is stretching the limit.

Post Reply