Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:26 pm
It's ok I'm old and restrained. 
So is your hair colour co-ordinated with the silver/grey one then?nteck uk wrote:It's ok I'm old and restrained.
RiderSite.com - Motorcycle Forums
NewB
Page 3 of 3
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:31 pm
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 2:04 pm
What hair lol.
Marriage and a son put paid to it
Marriage and a son put paid to it
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:42 pm
restrained..... so , kinky as well then?
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:10 pm
Well into leather
Re: NewB
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:23 am
If you are still looking..nteck uk wrote:Just introducing myself to the site.
From Essex currently have an SV .
Hope to find a nice Falco.
https://www.ridersite.com/viewtopic.php?t=9279
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:16 pm
I was wondering if anyone had owned a millie as well as a Falco.
The RSV is easer to find round these parts and seams to have a sorted suspension system.
There is one within easy distance from me
The RSV is easer to find round these parts and seams to have a sorted suspension system.
There is one within easy distance from me
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:18 pm
Do you really just want to be one of the crowd? That's the equivalent of White stilettoes !
Joking aside I that there a few that have but the only ones I know tend to end up on a tuono or a Falco HONEST
Joking aside I that there a few that have but the only ones I know tend to end up on a tuono or a Falco HONEST
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:45 pm
Both are great bikes, no question at all.
The Falco is a lot less common, (or much more exclusive), is more comfortable, has a lower seat height and can be made even more comfortable by raising the bars over the top yokes if you want to.
A standard early RSV of similar age to a Falco has same front suspension but better rear, although you will probably pay that much more for it.
Otherwise once the Falco is modded with an RSV rear shock you will not notice any difference in handling. (put on an Ohlins and it should be slightly better than the standard early Mille?)
People often put Mille swing arms on the Falco, but it is for the looks,
not to improve handling, as it doesn't.
The early Mille has slightly more power as standard, but with the normal Falco mods to cans and air box, you won't notice the difference riding, and the Falco probably has a marginally better mid range.
The only way you will notice the difference is by getting an Early RSV-R which was later called the Factory.
So it's mostly down to your choice, if you want a more focussed, more common race rep, go for the standard early Mille, if you want a less common bike with more comfort at a roughly similar price, go for the Falco.
I made my choice more than 7 years ago and have not regretted it for a second.
The Falco is a lot less common, (or much more exclusive), is more comfortable, has a lower seat height and can be made even more comfortable by raising the bars over the top yokes if you want to.
A standard early RSV of similar age to a Falco has same front suspension but better rear, although you will probably pay that much more for it.
Otherwise once the Falco is modded with an RSV rear shock you will not notice any difference in handling. (put on an Ohlins and it should be slightly better than the standard early Mille?)
People often put Mille swing arms on the Falco, but it is for the looks,
not to improve handling, as it doesn't.
The early Mille has slightly more power as standard, but with the normal Falco mods to cans and air box, you won't notice the difference riding, and the Falco probably has a marginally better mid range.
The only way you will notice the difference is by getting an Early RSV-R which was later called the Factory.
So it's mostly down to your choice, if you want a more focussed, more common race rep, go for the standard early Mille, if you want a less common bike with more comfort at a roughly similar price, go for the Falco.
I made my choice more than 7 years ago and have not regretted it for a second.